NASCAR is pushing back against a request for a preliminary injunction from 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports about team charters for the upcoming 2025 season.
The governing body argues that the teams are asking for something outside the norm since the period for signing charters has already closed. This legal response was documented late Wednesday, paving the way for a potentially heated hearing that was initially set for next week but has now been postponed due to Hurricane Milton’s impending threat to Daytona Beach.
NASCAR’s key points against the injunction emphasize that it would disrupt their operations by mandating the granting of charters despite the signing window being closed.
Additionally, NASCAR believes that financial compensation might be a more appropriate solution, given that the teams plan to race as open entries, which undermines claims of irreversible damage.
Chris Graythen/Getty Images
The situation is further complicated by Hurricane Milton, which could lead to a temporary office closure. In light of this, NASCAR has opted to delay the hearing to November 4.
“Defendants aim to present arguments and evidence to support their position, including:
“1) The plaintiffs are asking for a mandatory injunction that is only justified in extraordinary circumstances (which are absent here), as they’re trying to change the current situation by requiring NASCAR to issue charters for 2025 and beyond after the signing deadline.
“2) Plaintiffs cannot prove irreparable harm since they have agreed to race as open teams, meaning monetary compensation could address any losses they incur.
“3) Plaintiffs cannot demonstrate a strong likelihood of succeeding in their claims, as this involves contract issues rather than antitrust concerns.”
Front Row Motorsports’ owner, Bob Jenkins, affirmed the team’s commitment to compete regardless of the current charter situation, stating:
“We love the sport and are determined to keep our race team going, even as an ‘open’ competitor next year.
“However, if losses become too severe, it may ultimately jeopardize our operations, affecting our employees, communities, and fans.”
23XI Racing’s co-owner Curtis Polk echoed similar sentiments, expressing confidence in their ability to race if they choose to.
This legal battle underscores the delicate interplay between contract rights and the financial realities teams face in the highly competitive world of motorsports. With six charters at stake, NASCAR’s ruling will significantly affect the strategies of both teams and the overall competitive landscape.