The editorial team at The Palm Beach Post—the local paper in former President Donald Trump’s hometown—has given a nod to Vice President Kamala Harris for her performance in the presidential debate held on Tuesday night. They conveyed their belief that she was the clear standout of the evening.
Several indicators suggest that Harris emerged victorious in her initial—and possibly sole—face-off with Trump as they both seek the presidency. Early surveys reveal that a significant portion of the audience feels that the vice president outshone her Republican counterpart, while Trump has encountered mockery even from within his own party for wandering off-topic during the 90-minute debate.
In an opinion piece published on Wednesday, the editorial board echoed the sentiments of various analysts, stating that the primary winner was the American populace. They emphasized that viewers were presented with “two candidates with two very different political agendas, two contrasting policy priorities and two distinct visions for the nation they aspire to lead.”
Win McNamee/Getty Images
The Post editorial board affirmed, “It was clearly Harris for the win on Tuesday night,” noting that even the endorsements from pop icon Taylor Swift added a celebratory touch for Democrats.
They praised Harris for exceeding the expectations set by the media and a critical public. The vice president was noted for effectively addressing voters who might have still been on the fence. Her stage presence was characterized by a direct connection to the audience, cleverly mixing disdain and humor as she confronted Trump, occasionally delivering a “Bless-your-heart” glance of sympathy.
The paper remarked, “In effect, she made her competitor appear diminutive.” Trump’s performance, by contrast, seemed to reflect a lack of preparation for the debate and an insufficient focus on relevant policy issues.
The editorial board criticized Trump for sidestepping crucial points, like Harris’ association with President Joe Biden’s controversial border policies and inflation, instead devolving the conversation into bizarre arguments about the size of his campaign rallies and an unfounded claim that Haitian immigrants were eating neighbors’ pets in Springfield, Ohio.
They pointed out, “His inability to address direct queries regarding a national abortion bill, the situation in Ukraine, and the 2020 elections was detrimental.” Other missteps included referencing Hungary’s autocratic leader, Viktor Orban, as a “job reference.”
Both campaigns have declared victory in the aftermath of the debate. Jen O’Malley Dillon, Harris’ campaign chair, remarked in a statement that the vice president “commanded the stage on every pressing issue for the American people,” claiming Trump’s performance was “utterly incoherent.”
In response, Trump’s team praised his performance while accusing the debate moderators from ABC News of a bias favoring Harris throughout the night. The former president faced fact-checking multiple times for his misleading claims regarding Democrats’ stances on abortion and his outlandish assertion about Haitian migrants.
The road to the White House remains closely contested, and whether the debate significantly alters the trajectory for either candidate is still uncertain.
This week’s debate, as highlighted by the editorial board of the Post, has made the dynamics even tighter in the 2024 presidential race. Current polls suggest a virtual deadlock in key swing states critical for the election’s outcome. The debate showcased both candidates’ perspectives prominently, leaving it up to the voters to take note and decide as they move forward.