Donald Trump’s legal team is in a heated back-and-forth with special counsel Jack Smith about the timeline for his upcoming trial over alleged election interference, contingent on the outcome of Trump’s efforts to dismiss the case following a Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity.
Trump faces four federal charges: conspiracy to defraud the U.S., conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, attempting to obstruct an official proceeding, and conspiracy against rights. He has pleaded not guilty, labeling the charges as politically motivated.
Recently, Smith issued a revised indictment against Trump, reflecting the Supreme Court’s July ruling that protects presidents from prosecution for actions performed while in office.
In a joint court update, both sides outlined what motions and briefs they anticipate before the trial. However, they noted contrasting opinions on scheduling and procedure.
SAUL LOEB/AFP/GETTY
Trump’s lawyers are pushing for any legal proceedings following the immunity discussions to be scheduled for “spring to fall 2025.” They propose that details surrounding their dismissal motion be submitted by December 13, with responses from Smith by January 3, and hearings set for the last week of January 2025.
In contrast, Smith’s team wants the case to move forward promptly, suggesting that any motions from Trump be handled concurrently with the immunity discussions.
The prosecution opposes the dismissal claim, stating they will argue why the Supreme Court’s immunity ruling does not apply to the charges outlined in the revised indictment.
One commentator expressed skepticism about the future of the election interference case, suggesting it might falter in the Supreme Court. They also pointed out that should Trump reclaim the presidency, he could potentially pardon himself or influence justice department decisions regarding the case.
Earlier this year, Trump was found guilty on 34 counts of falsifying business records in connection with payments made to a pornographic actress before the 2016 election. He has criticized that trial as “rigged” and is now seeking to move that case to federal court, which could delay sentencing.